Sales tax campaign

The LERG in Monticello are preparing to begin an all-out onslaught on our common sense. The Advance released this week the first in an “installment” that seeks to account for the $15 million that the past 10 years of sales tax raised, but for me it raised more questions than it answered. I’m wondering if the Advance has been recruited as a promotional tool. So many of the businessmen that are backing this sales tax advertise with the Advance that they may not have a real choice.

There are no detailed plans for the expenditures of this proposed sales tax.

Unfortunately, at this point, I am growing more and more convinced that not only do we not need to extend the existing sales tax, but that the tactics that will soon be used by some of our city’s leaders are disconcerting.

In some recent minutes from a MEDC meeting, the following showed up as one of the topics:

Do not give the opposition time to prepare a defense.

Buttons have been ordered, and I suppose you’ll be able to recognize the LERG very soon by the shiny buttons they’ll be sporting all over town. Please remember that those buttons are saying, “We have no long-range plan for the city. We simply think the city will be unable to provide necessary services if the tax is not passed.” What services will not be provided is not answered. I have yet to understand from any conversations why so this minority of businessmen and members of the city council and mayor feel that the city cannot simply be run through normal revenues that every city brings in.

I’d encourage you to read the article in the Advance and then begin asking yourself, “Did we get our money’s worth?” Was it worth it? I’d also ask some strong “Why’s?” Was the $4.3 million that supposedly went to “economic development” well spent? Why does the city subsidize the MEDC and the Chamber of Commerce to the tune of $65,000 annually? The article says that $2.8 million was appropriated for the sports complex, but did all of that money get spent out there? On what? Here’s another thought: only $3 million of the total was spent on capital improvements. However, almost $1 million was spent by the MEDC building the SPEC building that still sits empty (and they’re still making payments on it). I’m sure that you can come up with your own questions, as well.

The plan to extend the tax another 15 years – with no definite plans attached to it is almost like saying, “Give the city a blank check for millions of dollars, and it will be spent it well.” After reading the first article, I’m not so sure. It’s also very interesting that just a short time before this special election, we are finally receiving details about how the money was spent. I’ve asked for that information for months for MonticelloLive, but never received it.

Please remember that we already have another one cent tax that goes to the county and another one cent tax that goes to the city. This sales tax extension is for the third cent that we’re already paying. In other words, we pay 6% for the state sales tax, 1% for county, 1% for city, and another 1% on this special sales tax. That brings our local rate to 9%.

Another thing that is VERY disturbing is the total lack of advance notice that the community is being given to participate in discussion about the sales tax. Yes, the LERG have fanned out across Monticello and spoken at the Rotary, Lions’ Club (next meeting), and other civic organizations and meetings, but it seems more of a sales job rather than a dialogue. However, the Advance that was printed last Wednesday (and most of us don’t get it until Thursday) announced two important and serious opportunities to discuss with the Community Design Center from Fayetteville. However, when were the meetings scheduled? For last Thursday at 6:00 p.m. and that Friday at 5:30 p.m! For most of us, it becomes nearly impossible to participate on such short notice. It’s almost like they want to be able to say, “Well, we did have meetings, but not many showed up.”

It just doesn’t sit right. Oh wait, I forgot… if the strategy is to “not give the opposition time to prepare a defense,” then it makes perfect sense.

Personally, I’d like to keep a little more of my money and ask the city to scale back, if need be. Until we see our county officials and our city officials begin to sit down and work together for the future of our community and region, I don’t think it’s time to pass another sales tax. Give us a break. No plan, no tax.

0 0 votes
Post Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

10 Comments
most voted
newest oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
K.T.
July 23, 2007 11:20 am

Ya know,I think I am coming around to this idea(yours)….but the problem is,very few are questioning…and it probably will pass…..

Lou
Lou
July 23, 2007 12:18 pm

I am glad to get another few point. I was thinking the same thing that we really don’t have much to show for it from the past years. Why would we give them a blank check.

David McDaniel
David McDaniel
July 23, 2007 3:15 pm

Jeff, I must say that my respect for your unbiased reporting has been greatly deminished. I am disappointed that you made reference to comments from another persons blog, when his/her blog contains so many inaccuracies. I ask you, please review the “real” facts before you align yourself with other blogs. The existing one cent sales tax was for a 10 year period, not 15 years. (the proposed expansion is for 15 years) Have you checked the cost of street overlays lately? The rising cost of oil has a direct impact on this. Have you checked to see what national and… Read more »

M Tucker
M Tucker
August 7, 2007 3:43 pm

Iam not for this added sales tax but since I am not in the citylimits I cant vote. I dont think it is fair;the city votes on cty but we arent allowed to vote on city. BUT we have to pay the consequences

Jeff
August 7, 2007 6:45 pm

I think it was Kermit Moss who posted an opinion piece on MonticelloLive about this very issue. I wish something could be done about it. After all, everyone in Drew County shops primarily in Monticello. Perhaps the best thing you could do is to influence friends and voters in the city to vote against the tax.

Nita
Nita
August 7, 2007 9:06 pm

On the issue of folks in the county not being able to vote on city issues: I’ve heard it stated numerous times by non-city dwellers, that they don’t want to live inside the city limits because they don’t want to pay the addtional property taxes, and they don’t like having any kind of limitations on property use. The citizens that live in the city limits have made a commitment to pay the extra property taxes etc. You can’t have it both ways. I don’t live in Little Rock, or Pine Bluff, or Wilmar, or Hamburg etc. But, when I shop… Read more »

Nita
Nita
August 7, 2007 9:30 pm

Just wanted to add one other thought:

Please don’t believe that all people who visit a city/town with local sales tax do not gain benefits from that tax.

In Monticello, when you visit you benefit from some of the following:

Police Protection,
Fire/Rescue Protection,
Streets to get to your friends/family,
Businesses who are supported with the infrastructure that must be maintained (water, sewer etc),
Parks – Pool – Sports Complex

And I’m sure that I’ve missed a few. It does take a lot of money to maintain these services. Please just think about it…

trackback

[…] are controversial. I have for the most part steered clear of politics (except for last year’s sales tax debacle). And I have been very vocal about my faith and love for Jesus Christ. It is the absolute […]

10
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x