An apology and sales tax update

It has been pointed out to me that the use of LERG in referring to proponents of our city’s one cent sales tax which will be voted on August 14 is discriminatory. I used the term that another local blogger came up with like he did – tongue in cheek, intending it (like I think its originator meant) to be a source of humor and light-heartedness. It was not taken that way by some.

While I’ve only had two conversations with people who were bothered by it,  I wanted to offer an apology to any who were offended. I didn’t mean to offend. It was also pointed out to me that there are many dynamic women leaders who support the sales tax initiative, and that’s why it was discriminatory. Again, my apologies, ladies.

I must say that I’ve been surprised at the response that local bloggers’ articles about their opposition to the sales tax have received. Some have been asked to quit blogging about it; I’ve been told that I do not have the best interests of our city at heart and that I’ve been negative.

I didn’t feel like I was being negative, but rather engaging in an exchange of ideas regarding the future of our community, which I love and whose people have consistently demonstrated unswerving commitment to the common good (consider community responses to house fires, illnesses, injured police officers, hurricane relief, baseball tournaments, etc.). We live in a great community!

It is disappointing to hear that because I care deeply about our community and its people, yet think differently about an issue like a tax that I don’t care about the community and therefore am negative.

I have yet to hear compelling reasons why I should vote for this sales tax. I invite comments here to that end. I also invite any and all to share here what they think about the upcoming sales tax. Perhaps someone will be encouraged to vote, one way or the other. That’s what we want, isn’t it? A great voter turnout on August 14? In that way, we’ll know that the results are truly the will and desire of the great community we live in.

One other thing… if the sales tax passes, that’s perfectly fine with me. I am not anti-tax. I  am simply pro-planning. I hope that our city and county leaders will sit down shortly after the vote, whichever way it goes, and begin extensive, visionary, cooperative planning for the benefit of everyone in our great community.

0 0 votes
Post Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

9 Comments
most voted
newest oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
dean
August 8, 2007 5:39 pm

gee… and there i went assuming that the discrimination charge was leveled because there are people who ARENT extraordinarily rich that are in favor of the tax. anyway, i never got the impression from either of you guys that you were using LERG in any other way BUT tongue-in-cheek, and quite frankly, the only high visibility folks i’ve seen talking pro-tax have been men, and not poor ones, either. i, like you, jeff, am not anti-tax, nor am i pro-conspiracy, as if tax proponents had a master plan to dig deep into my pockets dishonestly. i just hope for accountability… Read more »

K.T.
August 8, 2007 7:54 pm

While I am fairly pro-tax,I find the ads in the Advance horrific.I wont go into specifics in this venue,but what a turnoff!!!!!

Lou Arnold
Lou Arnold
August 9, 2007 6:54 am

Why can’t we talk about opposing the sales tax. The advance is not suppose to be opinionated yet everything is pro tax there. It just doesn’t make sense. Also in yesterday’s paper, in two different articles it had different totals on the amount money used for street repair. One says 1.7 million and the other 1.9. That is a big difference. Shouldn’t the totals be the same if they come from the same source?

Wade
Wade
August 12, 2007 9:39 am

Although I feel that we pay extremely high taxes around here despite the low pay most of our citizens get….I am going to have to try and prove to most people I know that it is worth it and here’s why. You would think to yourself, “hey, I don’t want to pay 9 cents on the dollar anymore” and “If we eliminate the tax then we can cut alot of the frivolous spending from our budget”. Sadly this is not what would happen. The first thing to happen would most likely be cuts in employment for the city. This would… Read more »

Jason
August 12, 2007 7:49 pm

I find it interesting that no one has made an association to where I got the term. Doesn’t anyone watch movies anymore. Ever seen the League of Extraordinary Gentlemen? By the way there was a woman in that league too. I wonder why the league now known as the “pro-taxers no factsers” pick on a word used in jest but, none of them have said that we are wrong in our concerns, just the we are anti-Monticello. The problem is here is that for the last ten years our city has been operating day to day on tax dollars that… Read more »

preacher666
preacher666
August 14, 2007 9:19 am

jeff sounds like u are still mad cause the city didnt give u the wc whaley building for ur,and i use the term loosely,church..i personally am against all taxes or at least the people who control them.rally dont think the paper is bias more like an old slut who will take money however they can get .the will even let u retards buy ads even u stepsons of retards also.oh well fixin to go start me a church so i dont have to work.hpoe the ole lady dont find out .think i got her fooled..he he

Jeff
August 14, 2007 9:44 am

“Preacher666” – I guess the unsettling thing is that I agree with part of your assessments. First, preachers can be lazy; I’m sure I’ve even contributed to that at times. However, I also know that’s because I’m only a man and I screw up. We all sin and have fallen short of giving our Creator the glory He deserves. I am supremely grateful that the cross of Christ provides forgiveness for anyone and everyone who acknowledges their rebellion and sinfulness against a loving and holy God. I don’t know how I would live daily without the assurance that my many,… Read more »

preacher666
preacher666
August 14, 2007 10:13 am

ok maybe u have a good church and your a decent preacher maybe not.if you are you would be the only 1 in monticello..anyhow i hope the thing doesnt pass cause i wanna see what the city can do with the same kinda buget us normal workin folks have to deal with everyday. bet all the kids still go to school and we still have roads to get em there.dont really want any new industry here myself cause of the kinda people it would attract.but i dont like the old money in this town either..be glad when it dies out.

9
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x